Calculator 01

ETF Fee Drag Calculator

Enter two funds and your plan. You'll get the dollar gap between them at year 10, 20 and 30 — plus a chart of both portfolios over time.

Direct answer: a 0.75% fee gap (e.g. 0.95% vs 0.20%) on a $500/month plan over 30 years at 7% gross return costs you roughly $150,000+ — about 20% of what your portfolio would have been worth. The inputs below let you test your own funds.

How the math works

Each month your contribution is added, then the whole balance grows at the net monthly return: (1 + gross return − expense ratio)^(1/12). This mirrors how expense ratios are actually deducted from fund NAV daily. It deliberately ignores taxes, bid-ask spreads and trading commissions — both funds are charged the same way, so the gap is a fair comparison.

Who this tool is for / not for

Use it if you…

  • Are choosing between two similar ETFs and only see the fee difference in basis points
  • Hold an old mutual fund or 401(k) default option charging >0.5%
  • Want a sanity check before rolling over an old account

Skip it if you…

  • Expect a forecast of which fund will outperform — this compares costs, not skill
  • Need tax-adjusted results (municipal/tax-advantaged accounts change the math)
  • Are comparing funds with different underlying exposure — apples vs oranges

Related tools

⏳ DCA vs Lump Sum

What spreading your entry over months costs or saves.

Open →

📉 Drawdown Recovery

The gain needed to break even after any loss.

Open →

🥊 Platform Comparison

TradingView vs TrendSpider vs StockCharts vs Finviz.

Open →

Choosing funds is half the job. Charting and screening them is the other half.

We use TradingView for ETF screening, alerts and backtesting visuals. If you sign up through the link below, this site earns a small commission at no extra cost to you — it's what keeps the calculators free.

Try TradingView free →
Affiliate link · Pricing verified as of November 2026 · See our disclosure.

FAQ

Does the expense ratio come out of my returns automatically?

Yes. Funds deduct fees from the fund's assets daily, which lowers the reported NAV. You never see a bill — that's exactly why the drag is invisible without doing this math.

Is a 0.20% expense ratio high?

For broad-market index ETFs, 0.03%–0.10% is common among the largest providers. 0.20% is reasonable; 0.75%+ for a plain index product is expensive. Sector, international and thematic ETFs typically run higher.

What gross return should I assume?

Long-run global equity averages have been roughly 7% nominal, but the future is unknowable. The good news: the fee gap is fairly insensitive to this assumption — lower returns actually make fees relatively more painful.